Jump to content
The Official Site of the Carolina Hurricanes

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Today
  2. I can't claim any real knowledge as to the impact of physicality, but it does seem to me that this age of players, like most sports currently, is filled with guys who have as a priority the protection and longevity of their bodies to max the number of years and seasons that the grape grows on their vine and is reachable. Contract bonuses, participation clauses, and just cumulative numbers that reflect loudly when contract negotiations roll around in a career are paramount in players and agent's minds. Most Players are going to play, in my opinion, at a level that provides a measure of comfort from long term injury, and is selfishly separated from the team's current needs on a season by season basis, while comparably choosing what's best, stats friendly, and longevity building for their own game and future. If their level of physicality is in a mix team wide that is not noticeably deficient, they seem to be reasonably fitting in and going about that level of business. Physicality at the upper level has to be a team buy in and execution, and ones who don't buy in when it is stated and carried out as team goals, aren't usually around long. There's THE not really knowing what our management stresses in that area, held alongside our speed, finesse, and defend that we do very well, and then there's the post game and season ending commentary of "not enough" physicality and push back when they get their butts handed to them. Somewhere between there we lie. All players at this level can play with more guts and glory, as to just get here is at least a measure of toughness in itself. The question falls into, "is everyone buying into it". If players judge for themselves that answer to be no, then protecting their own investment devolves into their business model. Just MHO.
  3. I think what happened is beboplar quoted remkin Canesfan then quoted remkin but from the quote on beboplar's post The software can't read where the original remking post came from and attributes the quote to beboplar where the highlighted text within the remkin quote box was made. To attribute the quote to the correct poster you need to go back to the original post, in this case remkins post and quote it from there. At this point I think we can only be aware of this glitch until a message board upgrade is implemented
  4. I was confused as I knew you were misquoted?
  5. That is weird . i went to quote @remkin
  6. I am being quoted for something I never said.
  7. I dont think Brind'Amour was referring to what you all have been discussing in regards to playing a more physical game . I think what he meant was how that the bruins learned what worked and what did not work in terms of on ice plays and how they were a young team like the Canes are currently and learned how to overcome problems . Just my take .
  8. Yesterday
  9. I've been following hockey since the early '60's and the Original 6. I would love to know when the Bruins did NOT play this style of game. I saw them play umpteen times in Hartford, and there was never a time they did not bring it. it's their signature.
  10. The Athletic just did a mock draft where they have the beat writers for each team make the picks. IMO this is the closest thing to what actually happens, as those people are all dialed in on their team in a way that even the best overall mock drafters are not. For instance, on the pathetic end of the scale, there are mock drafts on youtube and on the web that actually put a pick in for Toronto in our spot discussing their needs and who they'll pick at 13. These are recent mocks too, not pre-playoffs. There is another that says on our first rounder: "I really think Carolina goes for a D man here". Um. You are disqualified for embarrassingly egregious vacuum of even the pretense of any knowledge of how a team is likely to pick. But the beat writer for each team is as dialed in as anyone not at the actual draft table. Of course it won't play out the exact way of the mock, but IMO it is the closest best guess of everything out there. And here it is: https://theathletic.com/2072618/2020/09/21/nhl-staff-mock-draft-2020-changes-in-the-top-three-plus-an-audit-by-nhl-scouts/?source=dailyemail Our pick only, is made by Sara Civian: 13. Carolina: Yaroslav Askarov, G, SKA-VHL Sara Civian: Of course it’s always a risk going with a goalie in the first round, but the Hurricanes might have a steal at a position they like to keep homegrown here in Askarov. Thinking ahead, you’d imagine they will either keep Petr Mrazek on an extension or trade for a high-end goalie on a short contract, then either sign said goalie to another short contract or let him walk. Considering Alex Nedeljkovic hasn’t yet panned out as an NHL goalie, I could see the Canes taking a chance on “the machine,” should he drop this far. They showed in the 2019 draft they aren’t afraid to go for high-ceiling potential over security, and they aren’t afraid to draft goalies with high picks. As a guy who still favors picking Askarov, I'm encouraged by not only Sara's pick, as she may have some pulse of inside knowledge, though probably not, but also that the beat writers making the picks for their teams ahead of us all went for skaters. Yes, I take some issue with her line that the Canes have shown in 2019 "that they aren't afraid to go after goalies with high picks". There is a big difference between pick #13 and pick #36, after already picking in the first round. But the idea that they aren't afraid, in general, to go for high skill with downside risk, is valid.
  11. KHL best players of the week by position last week included: — Best goalie was Yaroslav Askarov (SKA), who won two of three games last week, including one away shutout. He faced a total of 78 shots (or 26 per night), with a saves percentage of 97.44%. Askarov had a goals-against average of 0.74. His shutout against Spartak on Sep. 17 was his first in the KHL. The KHL is no joke. Kochetkov has struggled there. Goalies who rock there lately have been really good in the NHL too. Save % .974. I don't want to judge on 3 games, and he plays on a juggernaut team, but if he ends up being a top KHL goalie this year, in his teens, he will be NHL ready at the very near end of the curve most likely. Further, if he keeps this up before the draft, it could draw interest from teams above us who might have been leaning away.
  12. Good thoughts Kjun. I do personally think there has to be that perfect blend of a LOT of skill, but enough physical in terms of personnel, but that in the end, the tenacity to battle for everything (as Top discusses) is the most important piece IMO. I loved Ruutu's big hits. And to be sure many of them produced useful turnovers. But, unless a team has multiple Ruutu's, the overall effect is not that big on an entire game, let alone season. Then those guys frequently break down physically too. I also loved Ferland's big hits. They were awesome. And created turnovers. And he scored early on too. BUT, the team actually started and sustained it's massive win streak with Ferland out. Look, give me a gritty guy who can pot 18 goals on the third line and pester and hit. I'm good with it. But the main thing is getting that Boston-like tenacity to be defensively up in the grill of everyone who touches the puck. That smothering checking game is what ultimately frustrates other teams the most. On Roy and Gauthier. Both are big, but different. Roy is not physical. He's big in that he's very tall. His game though is still not very physical. Goat is more physical, but still doesn't hit like he could. With that frame, Gauthier could be a terror out there. He doesn't play that way. Roy is having a very nice run in Vegas, but not due to the physical. Gauthier is getting a chance in New York, but has far from proven himself. IMO Gauthier has the hand eye skill, and shot, to be a power winger, but does not have NHL hockey IQ. Time will tell, I guess, but the committee ultimately decided it just wasn't going to work for Gauthier here. Gauthier also could make a living around the net, but not sure he's resigned to going that way as often as required. Anyways, it will be interesting to see how those guy's careers pan out either way.
  13. This is the ideal. I agree. The part I bolded I think is getting to what I think I'm on about and with which I completely agree. The big hits have an effect. I'm not saying they don't, but what I noticed even more from Boston was what you wrote above in bold. When we played the Rangers, we had time and space to play. When we played Boston, every inch was contested. I could even sense that guys who were used to having 6 more inches of space were annoyed to have a stick around them all the time. Yes, there were hits too, and that certainly factored into a slight drop in will, but to my eye it was even more the other thing. By having Boston always there right in a guy's grill, it wears down the will. The "fun" almost, of making plays that usually one can do, but now they can't. It's a bit like a guy who can produce at the Juniors, but then gets shut down in the AHL or NHL because the level of defensive competition is a whole 'nuther level. The disparity with Boston wasn't that huge, but it's that idea. Last year, we just finally capitulated to the "we can't beat them" feeling. This year we did better, but in the end just couldn't get there. As Brind'Amour pointed out though, Boston was not always this way. It took them some ups and downs and a lot of time with the buy-in to get a team that plays that way the vast majority of the time. So, my point would be to work to that type of full team buy-in to that tenacity (as you pointed out in that bolded part). This team is better than those also ran teams of the Eric Staal final years, but they are not yet at Boston's level. Does it mean looking for more Ferlands? IMO that can help, but even then the team tends to sit back and watch Ferland hit people. To get to where Boston is every member of the team has to have that "tenacity" you speak of. For Aho, it's probably not a teeth-rattling hit, but a back check that lifts the puck, but everyone is doing it all the time to their own ability. That, IMO is what Boston does most of the time. Now the uber-skilled Lightening still took Boston down, but they are playing much better team game too. If this team can mature against the comparison of playing playoff Boston so much, and take on their rink-wide tenacity to battle, good things will come.
  14. When we talk about wanting the Canes to take a more physical approach, we are not talking about Joe Frazier on skates. We are talking about players who the other team is looking over their shoulders, getting distracted from their own mission, on the look out for the next big hit. I don't get to see Canes action game to game, merely highlights which I enjoy watching. The player who exhibited this physicality, enough to get the other teams' attention, was Haydyn Fleury. Terrific clean hits. Say what you will about Martin Necas's development this year, and I agree I was wrong about favoring Gauthier over Necas when they left camp, Fleury grew into a 20 minute per game defenseman this season. He may not play on the top 2 defensive lines, because I don't see them pairing him with Pesce, but he nows brings 2nd line talent to the 3rd line. The only other Canes I can think of that bring that kind of hitting to the fore are Martinook and McGinn. Certainly, Ferland, Edmundson, and Tamu have the last couple of years, but they are all gone. I thought Nino was supposed to be that player, but I have not seen much. For me, that is the #1 off season goal, to bring in at least 1 more forward who can distract the opposition with his physicality. Does not have to beat anyone up, although when you bring the hammer, the nail often gets bent out of shape.........
  15. So guys like John Marino, Ethan Bear, and Matt Roy got votes for the Calder, but none for Necas. Ummm...ok. Everyone is gushing about Nick Suzuki and he got some votes. He had 41 points in 71 games and was -15, while Necas had 36 points in 64 games with a -6. Necas did get 5 votes for the “All Rookie” team at the forward position, but again Suzuki gets 137 votes. I guess that’s the difference between playing in Carolina and Montreal, Los Angeles, Edmonton, and Pittsburgh. Maybe I’m wrong but I think Necas deserved more recognition. We did have two defensemen get votes for the Norris though (Slavin, who finished 5th in voting, and Hamilton, who finished 7th in voting). Pretty impressive to have 2 guys finish in the top 7 for the Norris. Slavin, Hamilton, and Pesce all got votes for the All-Star team on defense. Again, pretty impressive to have 3 defensemen finish in the top 24 in voting.
  16. Have I ever said on here how much I despise The Hockey Writers website? Somehow I get their blogs and NEVER have I seen anything on the Canes?
  17. Last week
  18. If it's on, I pay, and I watch. Cause I want to. Same for going to the game. Life is simple round here.
  19. It's a really bad time for contract negotiations. We can "wish and hope" about a lot of things, but the fact of the matter is there is chaos out there, and it is putting everyone on a weak footing. Perhaps the NHL can swing a deal with ESPN/Disney, but I doubt they are going to get the money they want. Just like the cap will be flat, it is likely that TV contracts will be flat or falling. He touched on a few reasons for the chaos in ratings. But I think it is more complex than he's making it out to be. He made a statement that "things will come back." I contend things will never be the same, at least for a good 5 years. He also mentioned the "victory lap" some in the political sphere are making on ratings. I think he's right, it isn't all about politics and justice issues. However, his analogy to the Emmy's is weak because both sports and the Emmy's are entertainment, yet they increasingly are becoming platforms for issues beyond entertainment. The Emmy's are likely suffering from the same effect as sports. What's complex? For starters, habits. Some people just fell out of the habit of sport watching when the Great Sports Vacuum occurred. But let's throw cord-cutting on top of it. Cord cutting is a thing, despite the denials from many. And cord cutting is murder to ESPN. But you say, "Wait, YoutubeTV, Fubu or Hulu+Live" have sports. Yes, but a good deal of cord-cutters eschew those expensive options. I'm just some guy on the internet who watches the Canes, but my story is likely repeatable out there. When the Great Sports Vacuum occurred, I had to evaluate what the hell I was doing with all my TV dollars, so I ended up cutting the cord. I did subscribe to YoutubeTV to get the Canes games in the playoffs. Once they were out, I stopped and went to Philo, which is both sports and news free. Ah, there's my other beef, the news. Garbage. I really don't want to reward those networks right now. Now, I'm not a Never-Again-Shall-I-Watch sports guy because of some hurt feelings over some gesture or statement being made. But it did wake me up both on the issues (mission accomplished, athletes), but also on what the definition of entertainment is. Am I getting my entertainment dollar from these leagues? It got me thinking. I will consume sports and news more carefully, and probably only in-season. And when I say "consume," I mean pay for it with a subscription of some sort, like YTTV. Ultimately, that may mean 6 months out of the year. That materially affects ESPN and Disney. Sorry for their loss. They got pretty fat on the constant, easy stream of cash coming in from the cable companies. Well, it's changing, and ultimately, that's going to make any deal the NHL does with any of the sports providers a huge, huge problem.
  20. This has been a concern of mine for a very long time . Glad that The Hockey Guy brought it up . What's your thoughts ? Personally I would love for the NHL to go back to espn but only if it makes sense . With Espn connection to HULU and Disney+ having a partnership it could be a a good thing for people to get coverage of much needed hockey games shown.
  21. I provided a link to his other stats and clearly you can see for yourself who the better goalie is . Kochetkov is not as good .
  22. I've thought for quite sometime on this rem, and quite frankly have no answer, BUT that's not to say you just throw your hands up and retreat into that safe place. The answer is a little of all? As you've mentioned, Ruutu years ago won over our collective Canes' hearts after stepping off that plane, coming to the arena and throwing that massive hit on his 1st shift. Ferland too was a jewel early on, then the culmination of years of doing so prior to our acquisition caught up with his body. Judging from our attempts to acquire said "tough guys" with some skill rather than Neanderthal types, a team cannot trade from them in their later years, they apparently have to be groomed in one's own system? Not everyone is fortunate enough to happen upon a Wilson type. But I also believe those teams that play with "toughness" do so when EVERYONE buys in on the concept. Ans as top emphasizes in his prior post just ahead of mine, it appears (and you all know by now that the only ice I've skated on, unlike top it seems, has been by mistake) that a player has got to have the fortitude to give as well as take the hits. Collectively, thru the years of my involvement with the game as a couch (nee rink) spectator, the effort I've seen along the lines of what we refer to as "team toughness" has been at best lie a roller coaster? On some occasions, magnificent, while others, completely inept and embarrassing? Truly, IDK why as a team there's this pervasive laissez faire attitude, and I'd love to link it back to the ES yesteryear where the seed was planted, but obviously that should have long since faded? In terms of grooming someone to lead the way in being a Wilson type, a few years back, I recall my excitement when we picked up both Roy and Gauthier, but for some reason, both fizzled. Could it be that our scouts have similar tendencies along the lines of toughness that is pervasive on the team? But again back to Wilson, true, he is the leader there, but like Boston, Dallas, St Louis and several others, Washington has several players who play that tough game, so It's not just a single player. That one guy though can set the example that others join.
  23. This is true and I believe it's $850K, due to the fact that his up front bonus has been paid. You are going to base a decision on 4 games?? Why not just stay with Pyotr and show him a little confidence?
  24. But not consistently, and that's the problem: You never know which Canes you're going to get. Boston--you freakin' know, every time out. Over the years, rem, we've both watched innumerable games where this team comes out strong, flying. The forecheck's going, they're finishing checks in every zone, they score early--and the next thing you know, they are letting the play come to them, instead of continuing to dictate it. Or they come out totally flat and lose big to a mediocre team--only to completely dominate the next game, which always, somehow, seems to be against whomever's in first place in the conference. Physicality is definitely finishing checks and standing up for each other, but it is so much more. It's having both the stamina and the will--no, the burning desire--to play hard for every puck, and to take the play to the opponent every single shift of every single period of every single game, all season long. And guys who play that way tend to miss fewer games due to injury, because when someone does get hurt, 99 times out of 100, it is not the aggressor. (Except Micheal Ferland.) To me, the culture on this team will not be where it needs to be until this is how everybody approaches every game, and possesses both the skill and the physical capacity to play that way, 60 minutes a night.
  25. I was thinking if Carolina were to fail to get Askarov why not try trading with Edmonton for Ilya Konovalov . He is a goalie prospect the oilers picked up last year in the 3rd round that is showing great signs in the KHL 4 games so far with lokomotiv with a 1.57 Gaa and a .950 save % . https://www.capfriendly.com/players/ilya-konovalov
  26. And it's all about awareness, and being unwilling to get rolled. It is not a difficult play, but you have to want the contact and to make the guy think twice next time he's thinks about targeting you. Our guys are too often shying away from contact, and I literally cannot recall the last time any Cane threw a reverse.
  27. As for Staal, I don’t know how many times I called him “going through the motions” Staal on here. It was infuriating to watch so yes, his comment pisses me off too. It should **** off everyone.
  28. Watching one of those rumor videos on YouTube, it was mentioned that we are looking to move Reimer, which isn’t a surprise because I think we do want to upgrade. The only reason I’m posting this is that it was mentioned that while Reimer’s cap hit is 3.4 million, the actual dollar amount he is owed is around one million. Not sure if it is true or not but as was mentioned in the video this would obviously help with moving him.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...