Jump to content
The Official Site of the Carolina Hurricanes

itsjustme

Members
  • Content Count

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Everything posted by itsjustme

  1. They used Buffalo because they knew they would have the weather needed to support the ice, and probably have some snow to make it all the more fun. They also used Buffalo because it's so close to Toronto, and knew they would get plenty of fans. They used Pitt because NBC and the NHL is not going to do something like this without Sidney Crosby. He is the "face of the NHL" that they are banking on.
  2. What on earth are you talking about? I thought the update would interest some here. Sorry if it offended you.
  3. Not to add fuel to the fire or anything but here's an update http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/rangers/2...in-goal-vs.html specifically this part at the end "Upon reviewing the tape at the Rangers
  4. Every team in the league feels the same way about other teams at one time or another . The reffing, and disciplining is so inconsistent that it always seems like one team is favored over another. (I mean every team's fans, not every team. How would I know how every team feels?)
  5. And the reason they no longer have a contract with them is because of ratings. The NHL didn't bring in enough money for them.
  6. I'm too lazy to go searching. thanks for the welcome. Always fun to join new boards. And now I see the sticky right above me. Okay, so sue me.
  7. I didn't read this whole thread, but I think I've got the gist of it. If I'm repeating anything that's been said already, I apologize. ESPN doesn't respect the NHL because it never earned them any ratings. Pure and simple. The NHL doesn't bring in the ratings, therefore they are going to cover it as little as possible. (also, good luck getting a response from any mods on the Rangers board. There are none there. The Webmaster will occasionally boot people, but that's about it. If you want to post a petition there just go ahead and do it. If they don't want it there it will be removed, but chances are that the Webmaster will just ignore it. As long as you aren't offensive in your post)
  8. If I'd seen it I would have laughed, but if I were to go there now and laugh at it you would think it was out of pity. Sorry.
  9. I'll take that as a no. Good to see someone laughing around here though. This place is kinda serious.
  10. Didn't see the replay clearly showing their heads hitting, huh?
  11. It's not on any of the major news sites (tsn, nhl.com, etc) but it was reported in a blog here http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/rangers/''>http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/rangers/' target="_blank">http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/rangers/[/post]
  12. People don't usually headhunt with their own head. lol
  13. So Avery should be suspended only because there was an injury? Should every injury result in a suspension?
  14. There are plenty of times that players continue to try to fight after the refs get involved.
  15. In most fights in hockey games that I've seen players being held back from fighting by the refs usually try to fight despite being held. In this case Avery was successful at getting off some punches
  16. No concussion? That's surprising. Good news, but very surprising.
  17. Is there any articles online somewhere about this injury?
  18. I think this place needs an "I'm offended" thread
×
×
  • Create New...